<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Greg Attack &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregattack.com/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregattack.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to Gregory Burns' blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How do I price match?</title>
		<link>http://gregattack.com/2009/08/19/how-do-i-price-match/</link>
		<comments>http://gregattack.com/2009/08/19/how-do-i-price-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregattack.com/2009/08/19/how-do-i-price-match/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hehehe, Tigerdirect.ca just sent me this earlier today:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehe, Tigerdirect.ca just sent me this earlier today:</p>
<p><a href="http://gregattack.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/tgdirectfail.jpg"><img src="http://gregattack.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/tgdirectfail.jpg" alt="tgdirectfail" title="tgdirectfail" width="234" height="300" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1013" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gregattack.com/2009/08/19/how-do-i-price-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A sweet productivity suite deal?</title>
		<link>http://gregattack.com/2008/08/22/a-sweet-productivity-suite-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://gregattack.com/2008/08/22/a-sweet-productivity-suite-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregattack.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft is selling a bargain-priced &#8216;Students and Teachers&#8217; MS Office Ultimate Edition for $60 US.
Link
When I first saw the cheaper version of MS Office I wondered if it was MS&#8217; way of trying to compete with OpenOffice and maybe WordPerfect Office a bit without officially combating them. Microsoft&#8217;s always tried to make their poor-quality applications [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft is selling a bargain-priced &#8216;Students and Teachers&#8217; MS Office Ultimate Edition for $60 US.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/student/discounts/theultimatesteal-us/default.aspx">Link</a></p>
<p>When I first saw the cheaper version of MS Office I wondered if it was MS&#8217; way of trying to compete with OpenOffice and maybe WordPerfect Office a bit without officially combating them. Microsoft&#8217;s always tried to make their poor-quality applications seem like they&#8217;re on a higher level than they ought to be.</p>
<p>I mean, look at this product list:</p>
<p><code><br />
<center><br />
<table>
<tr>
<td>Access 2007</td>
<td>OneNote 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Accounting</td>
<td>Word 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Express 2008</td>
<td>Outlook 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Excel 2007</td>
<td>PowerPoint 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groove 2007</td>
<td>Publisher 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>InfoPath 2007</td>
</table>
<p> 	</center>	 </code></p>
<p>Is there anything there that&#8217;s actually any good? I don&#8217;t mean, &#8220;Does it do what it sets out to do?&#8221; good, I mean, &#8220;Does it have the kind of features it should have in 2002, let alone 2008 good?&#8221; These programs haven&#8217;t changed in 10 years, but Microsoft keeps adding checkbox features (collaboration, export-to-web, better macro support) but these apps are still dodgy. Microsoft&#8217;s new features almost never work the way they&#8217;re advertised, and people would have to become certified in an application to use basic features. My version of Outlook at work chokes on a large mailbox (well, I actually have about 5 IMAP&#8217;ed into it).</p>
<p>And the answer is a definite no. <a href="http://http://gregattack.com/2008/06/27/how-the-internets-going-to-kill-microsoft/">No</a>, <a href="http://www.ciao.co.uk/Microsoft_Office_Word_2007__Review_5652047">no</a>, <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/office-suites/microsoft-office-x-for/4864-3524_7-6910962.html?messageID=884819">no</a>. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an excellent marketing company, but rather poor on product quality, if you ask me.</p>
<p>Which actually brings up an interesting point.</p>
<p>Microsoft&#8217;s professional applications are its server line, development tools and that&#8217;s about it. Office isn&#8217;t professional, it&#8217;s a good application for your 12-year old to use to do his presentation on Napoleon in history class but it looks like garbage for a business presentation. Word is horrid. Excel is terrible as well.</p>
<p>Everything Microsoft makes is pretty much garbage. </p>
<p>Stop marketing with checkboxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gregattack.com/2008/08/22/a-sweet-productivity-suite-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Smooth Prognosticator</title>
		<link>http://gregattack.com/2008/05/20/the-smooth-prognosticator/</link>
		<comments>http://gregattack.com/2008/05/20/the-smooth-prognosticator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregattack.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gautam always posts some interesting tech industry related stuff on his blog, appropriate I guess because he labels himself a &#8216;Digital Media Futurist&#8217;.
This post: (link)  and the article he links to are pretty good reads, the author, Matthew Yglesias makes some really interesting points.
Still, can&#8217;t help but wonder if all this, &#8216;Where&#8217;s tech going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thesmoothdj.com">Gautam</a> always posts some interesting tech industry related stuff on his blog, appropriate I guess because he labels himself a &#8216;Digital Media Futurist&#8217;.</p>
<p>This post: <a href="http://www.thesmoothdj.com/2008/05/speaking_of_media_formats.html">(link) </a> and the article he links to are pretty good reads, the author, <a href="http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com">Matthew Yglesias</a> makes some really interesting points.</p>
<p>Still, can&#8217;t help but wonder if all this, &#8216;Where&#8217;s tech going next?&#8217; bloggery is just a way for people to escape their real lives.</p>
<p>I know it is for me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gregattack.com/2008/05/20/the-smooth-prognosticator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Apple rumor a day for speculation, eh?</title>
		<link>http://gregattack.com/2007/11/12/an-apple-rumor-a-day-for-speculation-eh/</link>
		<comments>http://gregattack.com/2007/11/12/an-apple-rumor-a-day-for-speculation-eh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregattack.com/2007/11/12/an-apple-rumor-a-day-for-speculation-eh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spelling of &#8216;rumor&#8217; up top is for the search engines. I figure they&#8217;ll see &#8216;Apple&#8217; and &#8216;Rumor&#8217; in the same line and bring me some hits.
I&#8217;m not doing this blog for traffic&#8230;.actually, I don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;m doing this blog.
So, hot rumor has Apple updating the Mac Pro line on the 13th, or January. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spelling of &#8216;rumor&#8217; up top is for the search engines. I figure they&#8217;ll see &#8216;Apple&#8217; and &#8216;Rumor&#8217; in the same line and bring me some hits.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not doing this blog for traffic&#8230;.actually, I don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;m doing this blog.</p>
<p>So, hot rumor has Apple updating the Mac Pro line on the 13th, or January. Hopefully it&#8217;ll be the 13th, as the Mac Pro line as it currently stands is underpowered for the price.</p>
<p>Intel&#8217;s newest chips though, the Penryn&#8217;s don&#8217;t sound all that amazing, so I don&#8217;t know what Apple could do to make the new line worth it, unless going 8-core throughout the entire range is feasible.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I think we&#8217;re going to see quad, octo, octo, 2GB RAM standard and some minor enhancements. I also think these Mac Pros will last a year on the market, which is probably about six months longer than they should considering Intel&#8217;s successor to the Penryn&#8217;s will be out early next year.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m looking for a Logic/Cubase box. I&#8217;m not sure this will be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gregattack.com/2007/11/12/an-apple-rumor-a-day-for-speculation-eh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballmer and Gates don&#8217;t help unemployment rates</title>
		<link>http://gregattack.com/2007/11/06/ballmer-and-gates-dont-help-unemployment-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://gregattack.com/2007/11/06/ballmer-and-gates-dont-help-unemployment-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregattack.com/2007/11/06/ballmer-and-gates-dont-help-unemployment-rates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hahaha: ZDNet has this story about Microsoft&#8217;s new $500m data center in Ireland
Microsoft said on Tuesday that it will spend $500 million on building a new European data-processing center in Ireland.
Microsoft said in a statement that the planned Dublin center will house tens of thousands of servers providing information and Web-based applications to Internet users.
Construction [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha: ZDNet has this <a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-6217222.html" target="_blank">story</a> about Microsoft&#8217;s new $500m data center in Ireland</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft said on Tuesday that it will spend $500 million on building a new European data-processing center in Ireland.</p>
<p>Microsoft said in a statement that the planned Dublin center will house tens of thousands of servers providing information and Web-based applications to Internet users.</p>
<p>Construction will begin later this month, with the center expected to be completed by 2009.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>And:</p>
<blockquote><p>Industry sources said the highly automated facility would create about 20 jobs. Microsoft employs 1,200 staff in Ireland at another site in Dublin.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gregattack.com/2007/11/06/ballmer-and-gates-dont-help-unemployment-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
