Comments on: Totally Unprecendented. http://gregattack.com/2008/10/03/totally-unprecendented/ Welcome to Gregory Burns' blog Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:47:25 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: admin http://gregattack.com/2008/10/03/totally-unprecendented/comment-page-1/#comment-34 admin Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:34:02 +0000 http://gregattack.com/?p=551#comment-34 Good point, maybe the 'unprecendentedness' of the scrutiny she's receiving means that it's unprecedented for her. Makes sense. It also helps me sleep better at night thinking that. Have a good one, Erin! Good point, maybe the ‘unprecendentedness’ of the scrutiny she’s receiving means that it’s unprecedented for her.

Makes sense. It also helps me sleep better at night thinking that.

Have a good one, Erin!

]]> By: Erin http://gregattack.com/2008/10/03/totally-unprecendented/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Erin Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:12:21 +0000 http://gregattack.com/?p=551#comment-31 I remember being excited when I learned about "precedents" in terms of law/trials. But I see how the use of 'unprecedented' could get annoying quickly! And in the Sarah Palin instance, wouldn't something like 'unwarranted' be more correct? Or has there never been scrutiny before? ^_^ I remember being excited when I learned about “precedents” in terms of law/trials.

But I see how the use of ‘unprecedented’ could get annoying quickly! And in the Sarah Palin instance, wouldn’t something like ‘unwarranted’ be more correct? Or has there never been scrutiny before? ^_^

]]>