
Star Trek: TNG was pretty cheesey, no?
[caption id="attachment_336" align="alignnone" width="200" caption="Why Tom Baker as Dr. Who as Sherlock Holmes? I love Tom Baker"]

[/caption]
Having seen The Dark Knight twice now (it’s a rarity for me to see the same movie twice, this one’s really good though so I happily indulged) it got me thinking about the nature of human conflict.
On the one hand, we have good versus evil, picking sides is easy in this one, we pick the good side – despite the fact many of us are more similar to the bad guy. We also have two men with (presumably) conflicts in their own hearts and minds. Whom do we side with when we take motivation into account? The one who doesn’t do evil, but that one also stands for the continuation of an establishment that’s been proven corrupt. He’s supporting a system that’s known to have deep faults. The one who is evil by every standard we can measure is like a plague that starts off killing the most diseased parts of society first, then works its way up to overthrow the established order completely. The bad guy is more successful at killing badness than the good guy is.
Anyhoo, I’m not really going anywhere with this, but it made me think of Sherlock Holmes vs. Professor Moriarty.
And I think it would be kind of cool to have my own Moriarty. Maybe not the unfathomably brainy type adversary (I don’t want to be overmatched now) but someone more than my intellectual equal who was trying to undermine me because of my shortcomings. That would be a fun challenge!
But then, hubrus is usually the end of such people and I certainly wouldn’t want that.
Categories: Movies
No Comments »